ginmar ([info]ginmar) wrote,
@ 2006-06-22 18:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Can't we all just get along?
No, actually, we can't. Seriously, there's no way. See, I'm a human being, and you hang around people who wnt to deny that very simple fact. They believe that people who have my type of genitals are evil, duplicitous, slutty, and so forth, and becuase you don't have to live with what those people say and do every day, they don't treat you that way. You want to make friends with them. And let's face it, treating women like shit just isn't a problem. The bar for treatment of women is so low that you can do just about anything and women will just accept it because, you know, there's nobody drawing a line. Except over and over again, which you fucking ignore in order to make friends with more men who hate women.

And, yeah, of course, they don't say it, but this is the thing: what the fuck do you think they'd say? "Excuse me, are you sexist?" You place such a high frickin' value on civility that you're missing that what's needed isn't civility but respect. There is a difference. It might be civil to prune your language of expletives and expressions of impatience after the three thousandth stereotype, but is it respectful to coddle bigots who just keep trotting out the same stereotypes over and over again? You're setting up one group of people for failure here, and it's not those that allegedly share your politics. Furthermore, how civil is it to be civil in the face of incivility? It amounts to demanding that the victims of polite incivility ignore bullshit---oh, dear me, a swear word!----and deal with bigotry everywhere, with no refuge, even amongst their alleged allies. If this is civility, thank you, I'll take that alleged rudeness of cutting through the bullshit and shitcanning all the same old disproven arguments.

The problem with civility is that it's easy to pretend to be civil and use it to hide all manner of hostility beneath it. I don't see much value in that. Prune away the polite terms, the passive aggressive "Oh-I-didn't-meant-to's" and what you have is hostility. So how on earth are we supposed to get along with someone who isn't bothered by people who hate us and think we're evil? How is that acceptable?

Tolerating the lies spewed by the anti-feminists like Glenn Sacks no matter how pleasant he is guarantees that the movement gets stuck in one place, fighting the same old battles over and over again. It also keeps the standards low, because if male feminsts are afraid to put their foot down with other men, those same men often feel entitled to spew their bull at female feminists, too. After all, it's okay with other guys. What, do you want special rights? What's your problem, it's civil discussion here. Look how unreasonable your response is.

Being a feminist is hard work, no doubt. It's always tempting to give up, becuase you're fighting every day, whereas sucking up to the patriarchy makes you popular. It'll make you unpopular, not popular, and it will give you ulcers. MRA propaganda aside, there's nowhere in the world where women have equality, much less superiority. You don't have to do anything, really, to renounce feminism; all you have to do is be passive in the face of anti-feminist bigotry. Oh, wait. It's a conundrum that has some people questioning how much difficulty they want to deal with if it contradicts something they feel is more important---say, bonding with male sexists and male students who want to be feminists 'later'. SAying you're a feminist doesn't make it true, and when you buddy buddy around with men who hate women, you have to expect that people will ask why that hatred of women doesn't matter. Because it does matter.

It may not matter to you. It does matter to us.


(Post a new comment)


[info]odanu
2006-06-23 12:37 am UTC (link)
Excellent. And by the way, this could almost as easily have been written to a racist vs a sexist. That boring old Voting Rights Act? We don't need it anymore. Riiiiiiiight.

(Reply to this)


[info]saoba
2006-06-23 12:37 am UTC (link)
I had the following exchange over twenty years ago

Pro-feminist man "But you don't understand how hard it is being a male feminist!"

Me "Yeah? Think it's any easier being an actual woman?"

Oddly enough, he had no comeback.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ginmar
2006-06-23 12:38 am UTC (link)
Hugo actually said something like that to a woman once.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]saoba
2006-06-23 12:41 am UTC (link)
At which point, you know, I'm just inclined to say sweetly 'Dude, if it's too hard for you then just step the hell off and stay out of my way. I can work for equality a lot harder and faster if I don't have to hold your hand and tell you what a big strong wonderful man you are.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bigbigtruck
2006-06-23 02:00 pm UTC (link)
Oh snnnnnnnap!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ginmar
2006-06-23 02:07 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I want that on a bumper sticker. I mean, dude, you teach women's studies or whatever, and from what I've seen you teach women's studies in an exceptionally lame way, so as to not offend the boys. And then you whine that you're out there every day, OMG?! Get a sex change, asshole. Then walk a mile in my fuckin' high heels.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Well done!
[info]petuniahortense
2006-06-23 01:58 am UTC (link)
Excellent analysis. Excuse while I huntup the collection plate. The best time to pass the plate is right after the altar call.

(Reply to this)


[info]enname
2006-06-23 02:46 am UTC (link)
Perfect.
Another to add to my memories.
I thought the whole point of feminism (apart from helping other women) is that you stop tolerating that sort of shit. That you actually stand up, point it out and end playing nice.
As you said, I am human and if you deny me that there is no way I can get along with you.

(Reply to this)


[info]ide_cyan
2006-06-23 04:19 am UTC (link)
Courtesy and civility both point to politeness, which is a manner that "respects accepted social usage". And/or "showing regard for others".

Trouble is, accepted social usage is to show disregard for women's rights, so, you can't have a polite revolution.

(Reply to this)


[info]glinda_w
2006-06-23 04:43 am UTC (link)
slightly off topic. or not.

was at the housing authority office today (got the voucher, yay!!).

saw a couple, in line - she in everything from headscarf to long sleeves to long skirt. He in shorts and t-shirt. 'cause obviously the female is otherwise too tempting, but who'd be tempted by the males? couldn't help thinking things like "sauce for the goose" and mentally growling.

there are times when it would be so much easier not to be a feminist. like 24 hours a day, seven days a week. not gonna happen though, not to me, been fighting this for too long. *very wry*

(Reply to this)


[info]l33tminion
2006-06-23 04:54 am UTC (link)
Speaking of hostility, Gin, have you seen this article? I was wondering what your take on it would be. The hostility in the comment threads (from both genders) is astounding.

(Reply to this)


[info]msinvisfem
2006-06-23 07:15 am UTC (link)
**loves you from a far** :-)

Tolerance of other people's intolerance seems to be the new liberal norm now a days. They are so into things being peaceful on the surface that the moment a person "makes a fuss" to call someone on their bullshit, it is the person calling the bullshit who is "intolerant" not the bigot (and the onlookers' passiveness) in the first place.

Only recently I have been reminded of this by supposedly very liberal, progressive individuals - expect they're looking more to agree with each other and pat each other on the back about how good they are rather than trying to, I don't know, progress...

A big thing to the whole tolerating intolerance is that the individual doing the tolerating mentally agrees with bs-caller and but personally identifies with the offender. That is, they could see themselves "accidentally" making a mistake, so it is more important to forgive and forget (when it doesn't affect them), so they have a precedent in place of forgiveness so if they "accidentally" transgress they won't receive the third degree. They call it tolerance, I call it Covering-Your-Ass™.

(Reply to this)


[info]angrybeaverclub
2006-06-23 02:58 pm UTC (link)
Being a feminist is hard work, no doubt. It's always tempting to give up, becuase you're fighting every day, whereas sucking up to the patriarchy makes you popular. It'll make you unpopular, not popular, and it will give you ulcers.

I was just discussing this with my (gay white rich male) boss yesterday. I had mentioned that an ad on Yahoo IM was extremely offensive to me, and I wasn't going to use IM to communicate with him until the ad was gone (we have other tools of communication available). He went on and on about how it's better to look back on your life and know that you didn't "waste time being angry" than to constantly fight and try to change things.

Wha...?

And what, exactly, would he know about fighting? He takes home a six figure salary, and still shops at Walmart and Sam's Club, despite my constant reminders of the evils of that company. It must be so easy to just passively accept the way things are, and have no reason to try to change them.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ginmar
2006-06-23 03:03 pm UTC (link)
That's it exactly. It's easy; it's effortless, and it's totally passive, becuase it's built right in.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sarah_frost
2006-06-23 10:57 pm UTC (link)
Adding this to memories. Sometimes it's not even a question of needing a polite devil's advocate or something of the kind, when it's real people these matters impact on (a lot more than they impact on white-middle-class me). There is NOT a Sooper Sekrit Feminazi Conspiracy making excellent progress taking over the world who really desperately need dissenting MRA voices to save the poor mens. I admire intellectualism, but I think feminism is a bit more relevant to the real world than a theoretical academic discussion requiring different polite perspectives. (Not that academic discussions are always that polite, either.)

(Reply to this)


[info]simplykimberly
2006-06-24 05:52 am UTC (link)
Have you seen this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYaczoJMRhs His answers to "why do you write such strong women characters" are just awesome! Plus, Meryl Streep! :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ginmar
2006-06-24 12:42 pm UTC (link)
Oh, no, I haven't.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vassilissa
2006-06-24 08:52 am UTC (link)
Can't we all just get along?

One possible response to a privileged person asking this: "Sure - let's kick back and relax. I'll lie down here, and you can sit back and put your feet up... on my neck."

I've never used that response, and I'm not going to, even though it's often true. But as long as "can't we all just get along?" means "Why don't you shut up about what's wrong with the status quo?" I'm not going to shut up about it.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…